The Grant
For 2012 and 2013, Meta counted four point one billion dollars of Mark Zuckerberg’s stock-option income as research wages on its tax forms — classifying the chief executive as a researcher — and claimed about three hundred fifty-five million in federal R&D credits. The IRS is fighting it in Tax Court, where Meta’s argument includes that the year that matters is 2005: the year the options were granted, when Zuckerberg personally wrote the code and oversaw all of Facebook’s development. Under oath, Mark walks the government’s counsel through the filings, the replication, and a settlement paid in 2005 dollars. The record is from 2005.
NARRATOR: The IRS is suing Meta over four point one billion dollars the company filed as research wages. Meta's researcher testifies today.
COUNSEL: Mr. Zuckerberg, 2012. You were chief executive of Facebook.
MARK: In 2005 I wrote the code personally.
COUNSEL: The question was 2012.
MARK: 2005 is the year that matters. It's in the filings.
COUNSEL: The filings also classify you as a researcher.
MARK: Four point one billion in research wages. Very competitive program. I ran against myself and won.
COUNSEL: And what did you research?
MARK: The Like button. A longitudinal study. People enjoy clicking. That's science.
COUNSEL: The options were granted in November 2005.
MARK: Ten million options. By publication they'd replicated to a hundred and twenty million shares. The research multiplied. That's how you know it's working.
COUNSEL: You oversaw sales. Security. Content moderation.
MARK: In 2005 I oversaw all of it. Everything since is replication.
COUNSEL: The IRS calls your stock income compensation. Not wages for science.
MARK: Options are theories about the future. Theories are research. We were extremely theoretical.
COUNSEL: The government offers to settle for the full three hundred fifty-five million.
MARK: In 2005 dollars.
COUNSEL: ...The IRS accepts payment in 2005 dollars.
MARK: Meta accepts. We'll invoice the court for the conversion study.
COUNSEL: Let the record show today's date.
MARK: The record is from 2005. The year that matters.
COUNSEL: Sustained.
NARRATOR: The settlement holds. Both sides dated it 2005. Nobody dared check the math.